Watch how David McQuinty uses a bag full of tricks to dodge the following question:
Peter van Dusen:
Is it fair to hold the Conservative government to a set of targets that the previous Liberal government didn't try to reach for ten years?
Enjoy!
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Licence.
Progressive Media
Democracy Now!
Center for Media and Democracy
Human Rights and Activism
Wikileaks.org
Amnesty International
Amnesty International Canada
Human Rights Watch
Transnational Institute
Council of Canadians
Dutch News
Nova
NRC Handelsblad
Radio Netherlands
Qatar
Al Jazeera
UK News
BBC News
Guardian
Independent
US News
Democracy Now!
BC Blogs
Paul Willcocks
US Blogs
Noam Chomsky
Norman Solomon
ZNet Blogs
Buttons
Sponsors
Marketas Bed and Breakfast Victoria BC
Victoria B&B
Personal Life Coaching
6 comments:
Hey Erik, why did you shut down comments on that other thread?
Because I get tired of Blogging Tories trolling my site.
Not sure how I was trolling. You were the one using the words "stupid" and "crap."
You usually this sensitive?
Hey, you started it by saying my analogy stinks where I've proven the analogy goes;
Small improvements can lead to far bigger pollutions.
Then you say the same thing I say in different wording ("Companies can't expand unless they devise a way to limit the total emissions.), , calling it a contradiction.
For once go with your own wisdom: "I realize that I'm wasting my time here but oh well."
Move on (or be deleted).
Be deleted? Why? Is commenting on this blog reserved only for people that agree with you? What are you afraid of?
We didn't write the same things. I take it English is not your first language.
Have you ever met Werner Patels? You know seem to have popped out of the same pea pod.
Peter, I have no problem with visitors who have a different opinion, but this blog has no place for people who:
- ignoring facts
- distort what I say to make a cheap political point
- refuse to apologize for doing so.
You're probably too ignorant too see this, but with the few posts you've made on my blog, you've already qualified for all three.
There are enough blogs out there that will argue with the twisted way of neo-con reasoning, just not me.
Good for Werner Patels to have come to the same conclusion.
NB: We did talk about the same things. They are a different way of explaining intensity targets, only yours has left out "the fact" that major expansion of an industry will result in more pollution; hence twisted reasoning. GFY, PR.
New comments are not allowed.